Slave to the algorithm
Quickfire Q&A with our own Chief Architect on working with Tylie Tandem, one of our latest integrations.
Category

This was originally posted on the Peach website. Find out more about the rebrand from Peach to Cape.io.
What are the most challenging and fulfilling aspects of collaborating with developers outside of Peach?
I think the challenging piece was keeping the synergy of both platform’s different terminology. Every company has their own internal platform terminology and one of the most challenging parts is making sure both partner’s terminology is aligned to the other for customer ease.
In regards to the most fulfilling aspect, there is an obvious answer which is seeing the integration starting to work. Witnessing the data coming through correctly is hugely rewarding. Knowing that customers now won’t have to re-enter data and instead can enjoy it all being pulled from Tylie into Peach without the fear of human error dirtying the data is by far the most fulfilling aspect of this API integration. I suppose on a personal level, it’s always great to have an opportunity to work with developers outside of Peach with different perspectives and personalities, also another obvious added benefit.
What were your impressions of the Tylie Tandem platform? Was there anything unexpected or unique about it?
Interesting question. I didn't actually really see the platform per se, so it was more about the API and its interactions. In terms of unexpected technical differences, I remember at the beginning of the integration we encountered a problem based around how the two platforms grouped campaigns differently.
For Tylie, their concept of a campaign is more traditional, it spans over a long period of time, whereas in Peach, we describe a campaign as being the point of delivery. This created some interesting complications in which we had to build unique additional features to compensate and make the integration flow properly. It all worked out in the end though!
Do you consider integrations an essential part of the future of Peach's growth?
In one word - Yes. I’d be lying to say it’s not difficult to build at times but once those problems are overcome, there are limitless efficiencies between two integrated platforms.
For Peach, it gives us a great opportunity to showcase new features. We can push these through an API integration quicker than if we did it through our user interfaces, because that takes a much longer UX journey. Being able to leverage a lot more features quicker through an integration is a surefire way to ensure future growth and success.
Are there any drawbacks or risks to integrations?
The biggest risk working with integrations is to ensure we don't break it. It’s important to keep the integration beneficial for both partners as well as of course customers who are using it. That means we are inevitably required to constantly innovate and push new features through. The risk of breaking it is always there but we shouldn’t let that stop us from updating and improving the API either.
And then finally, are there any additional services that further integration might benefit either Tylie or Peach customers?
Like I said above, it’s important to keep adding to integrations to keep both Tylie and Peach customers happy. Tylie has already requested looking into closed caption support as well as radio delivery and they are already in the backlog to be worked on to make the integration even more encompassing of delivery needs.
News
Stay ahead of the curve
Curious about the latest in marketing and advertising? Subscribe to our monthly Promarketers newsletter.

Jul 9, 2026
Navigating the compliance maze
Gambling & sports betting ad regulations across the U.S.

Jul 9, 2026
Sun, sea, and… substantiation?
3 compliance traps in summer travel ads

Jul 2, 2026
Cannes Lions 2026: AI grew up, now the industry has to learn to trust it
The conversation has shifted from whether AI can automate advertising to whether automated campaign execution can actually be trusted.

Jun 26, 2026
Introducing: Auto Cropper
Introducing a new AI-powered auto-cropping feature in our Creative Automation solution.

Jun 25, 2026
You don't have an AI problem. You have a trust problem.
Every marketer is being sold intelligence. But intelligence without accountability is just noise at scale. Here's what the real question actually is.

Jun 24, 2026
Why creative infrastructure is the real bottleneck in media orchestration
The disconnect between creative and media in programmatic advertising.

Jun 2, 2026
The new reality: Football marketing without FIFA rights
The 2026 World Cup is shaping up to be one of the biggest advertising moments of the decade. But for brands hoping to ride the wave of football fever, the line between “inspired by football” and “infringing on FIFA rights” has never been thinner. From unofficial sponsor campaigns to alcohol and gambling promotions, regulators and rights holders are watching closely. Here’s what marketers need to know before launching a football-themed campaign this summer.

May 26, 2026
How enterprises are actually adopting agentic AI
The shift to agentic AI isn't happening the way most vendors describe it. There's no cliff where enterprises suddenly ditch their AI wrappers and commit to full agent orchestration. Instead, they're moving through layers, testing frameworks with one team, keeping production systems stable on another.

May 26, 2026
Real-time ads in a regulated world
Understanding the real challenges of gambling & sports betting advertising in the US

May 8, 2026
Brazil votes. Cape.io already knows what that means.
Cape.io has powered Brazil's general elections for four editions, managing 500 channels and 155 million voters. Here's how we do it.


